Can anyone believe this CIA front would actually publish something that sounds fair? Here it is:
Panetta’s face is so rustic. He wants to keep pressure on Al-Qaeda by supporting it in Syria. What a doofus!
So much for this so-called American Jihadist. Sounds like “American Psycho”:
John Esquire is trying to send me a link to a CNN report which he found surprisingly fair. The report exposes the Jabhat Al-Nusra as responsible for some massacre in Syria. I will post it when I receive it. Probably tomorrow. The BBC with its Lyse (pronounced “lies”) Doucet is trying to somehow put the blame on the SAA. They will fail. In any case, there is a problem with body counts because most of the carcasses belong to the terrorists, as I told you already. The West and the anti-government media is trying to create another red herring a la Al-Houleh.
Not a lot of news today in the media because of the Algerian fiasco. I think Algiers acted too rashly, essentially employing what I call the “Tlas Response” which is to attack the instant terrorists announce some new abomination. I saw this at the Semiramis Hotel in Damascus back in 1976. General Mustafa Tlas didn’t give the PDFLP hostage takers even a minute to breathe before special forces converged on the hotel and captured every criminal. They were hanged the day after – after appeals and all. Justice delayed is justice denied.
The Algerian scenario might be a godsend for our soldiers in Syria. People can now put in better focus the events leading up to the injection of Al-Qaeda rodents into the conflict. NACOSROF, the SOHR and all the Lebanese CIA front media factories will now have to really outdo themselves to get the Syrian situation back on the front page. It won’t be easy. And the army is truly crushing the enemy.
SOME NEWS FROM SYRIA WITH MORE COMING IN:
No names of dead cockroaches yet, but a heavy firefight is taking place now on the Salamiyya-Raqqa Highway with a documented 16 criminals killed and 4 flattop trucks armed with machine guns destroyed. I will have more on this tomorrow morning.
Mark the Brit, a/k/a Llewellyn the Great (who can’t spell his own name, by the way) sends this list which omits the Zionists:
YRPER U SURPERS: U need to add Syria to this Wiki
Llywelyn the Great
Hans sends this commentary about battlefield tactics:
hans has left a new comment on your post “FIRST POST – JANUARY 18, 2013 – MEDIA MENDACITY AL…“:
Syrian army needs arms for infantry and it’s special forces. This battle will be won by the infantry. How true it is but apparently Hezbollah/al Quds battle field tactics are being studied and modified to fit with Syrian terrains. If it was easy you could be sure that NATO/Israel would have launched an attack. Who would be able to question them.
ANSWER: My friend, Hans, the SAA is very well-equipped for conventional battles. Unfortunately, no one guessed it would have to fight a terrorist insurgency. But we’re doing fine and the battle has turned in our favor. Keep in touch. Z
Anonymous shares our dreams. We’ll be praying for your wish list:
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post “FIRST POST – JANUARY 18, 2013 – MEDIA MENDACITY AL…“:
Good to hear about weapons from Russia. Another 100 Eskanders would be useful. And maybe some T90 tanks
ANSWER: I think we are flush with Eskanders now. The Russians know how many we need to neutralize the Patriots.
As far as the T-90 goes, it’s really just a better T-72 which Syria does not need and cannot afford. Syria’s strategy with the Zionist enemy was going to rely on anti-tank armed infantry, heavy and concentrated artillery and missile power along with a daunting array of anti-aircraft weapons. I don’t believe the Iranians see any need for this particular tank especially since Syria’ T-72s have been upgraded for better armor protection. We have good tanks and our RPGs are even better. ZAF
Wouldn’t it be nice and expensive?