SECOND POST – APRIL 5, 2013 – THE WAR CRIMES CASE AGAINST JORDAN, ET AL.; SOME INTERESTING PROPAGANDA

SECOND POST – APRIL 5, 2013 – THE WAR CRIMES CASE AGAINST JORDAN, ET. AL.; SOME VERY INTERESTING PROPAGANDA

SYRIAN PERSPECTIVE IS CALLING ON THE SYRIAN GOVERNMENT TO BRING WAR CRIMES CHARGES AGAINST THE FOLLOWING COUNTRIES AND LEADERS:

KING ABDALLAH II BIN HUSSEIN OF THE HASHEMITE KINGDOM OF JORDAN
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
DAVID CAMERON, PRIME MINISTER OF THE UNITED KINGDOM
NICOLAS SARKOZY, FORMER PRESIDENT OF THE FRENCH REPUBLIC
FRANCOIS HOLLANDE, PRESIDENT OF THE FRENCH REPUBLIC
RECEP TAYYIP ERDOGHAN, PRIME MINISTER OF THE REPUBLIC OF TURKEY
PRINCE HAMAD BIN KHALIFA, LEADER OF THE STATE OF QATAR
KING ABDALLAH BIN ABDUL AZIZ, KING OF SAUDI ARABIA
BENYAMIN NETANYAHU, PRIME MINISTER OF THE “STATE OF ISRAEL”

This demand is being made of the Foreign Minister of the Syrian Arab Republic, His Excellency Walid Al-Mouallem.

Whereas the Charter of the United Nations, Article 33, requires that member states which are parties to any dispute “the continuation of which is likely to endanger the maintenance of international peace and security, shall first of all, seek a solution by negotiation, enquiry, mediation, conciliation, arbitration, judicial settlement, resort to regional agencies or arrangements or other peaceful means of their own choice.”

Whereas on November 17, 1950, the United Nations passed resolution 378/B (V) where the General Assembly condemned “the intervention of a state in the internal affairs of another state for the purpose of changing the legally established government by the threat or use of force” and declared “any aggression, whether committed openly, or by fomenting civil strife in the interest of a foreign power, or otherwise, is the gravest of all crimes against peace and security throughout the world.”  (See United Nations and the Definition of Aggression, Lawteacher.net)

Whereas the Rome Statute (hereinafter: “The Statute”) of the International Criminal Court, U.N. Doc. 2187 UNTS 90 (entered into on July 1, 2002) sets out the following four (4) categories of crimes committed by nations and those in positions of responsibility in those nations:

(a) Crime of genocide

(b) Crime against humanity
(c) War Crimes
(d) Crime of Aggression

In Article 7 of the Statute, crimes against humanity are sub-categorized as:

(a) Murder
(b) Enslavement

(f)  Torture
(g) Rape, sexual slavery
(h) Persecution of any identifiable group
(k) Any and all other crimes against humanity to be agreed upon.

In Article 8 of the Statute, War Crimes are defined as:

(a) Breach of the Geneva Convention of August 12, 1949:

(i)     Willful killing;
(iii)   Willfully causing great suffering
(iv)   Extreme destruction and appropriation of property
(vii)  Unlawful deportation
(viii)  Taking of hostages

IT IS THEREFORE THE POSITION OF THE SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC that the individuals and states listed herein-above be brought before the International Court of Criminal Justice in the Hague to answer arraignments on the charges listed herein-above.

As to King Abdullah Bin Hussein II, his crimes are as follows:

Crimes against humanity in that he has participated in a calculated and systematic aggression against the Syrian Arab Republic (SAR) by encouraging and providing haven to military organizations bent on overthrowing the legitimate government of a sovereign state and member of the United Nations and in so doing, has deliberately brought destruction of infrastructure, property and assets of said SAR.

Crimes against humanity are further detailed as willful killing of innocent Syrian civilians; the willful causing of great suffering; extreme destruction of property; unlawful deportation of Syrian civilians and support and aiding and abetting the act of taking hostages.

The Defendant, King Abdullah Bin Hussein II, has participated in a series of activities involving murder, enslavement, torture,  rape and persecution of the SAR’s ethinic minorities.

The Defendant, King Abdullah Bin Hussein II, is complicit in an illegal effort to overthrow the government of a sovereign nation and U.N. member state, to wit: the government of President Bashar Hafez Al-Assad of the Syrian Arab Republic.

In furtherance of the scheme to change the government of the SAR, the Defendant, King Abdallah Bin Hussein II of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan has ordered his armed forces to assist the Defendant, United States of America, in training males from the SAR and other nations in the paramilitary tactics of terrorism in order to create a state of instability in another nation and to murder and do violence to innocent civilians of the SAR.

He has furthermore permitted other offending states,  to wit: the United States and the United Kingdom, to establish monitoring bases on Jordanian soil so that the enabling of the terrorist actors is successfully completed.

AS TO PRESIDENT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:

The President of the United States of America has led a movement among certain members of the United Nations who are listed herein-above to overthrow the existing and legitimate government of the SAR.  Obama is guilty of crimes against humanity and crimes of aggression.  Obama has committed the following acts:

1. Armed terrorists with “non-lethal” weapons designed to enable terrorists to kill the soldiers and civilians of the SAR;

2. Encouraged and facilitated the delivery of lethal weapons to said terrorists by using other co-conspirators including:  The State of Qatar, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Saad Hariri, Uqab Saqr, Britain, France and Turkey;

3.  He has committed crimes against humanity by providing logistical support to terrorists acting against the state of Syria by ordering his ambassador to Libya, the late John Christopher Stephens, to facilitate delivery of “lethal” weapons from Libya via ship to Turkey and then to the terrorists based in Apaydin, Incirlik, Gaziantep and other locales in southern Turkey.

4.  Obama’s crimes against humanity have resulted in the deaths of thousands of innocent civilians, Muslim and non-Muslim alike.  However, his crimes are especially heinous because of the targeted attacks against innocent Christians and Alawis by members of Jabhat Al-Nusra, a branch of Al-Qaeda, which has been labelled a “terrorist organization” by President Obama’s own country and, yet, which receives training and weapons from the United States, the U.K. and Turkey, inter alia!

5.  Obama’s crimes have been multiplied by American military advisors in both Jordan and Turkey whose task it is to “direct” operations of terrorists inside the SAR.  These advisors are responsible through their aiding and abetting in a genocide committed against the Syrian people.

NOTE TO READERS:  Your editor is lawyer and has no problem putting together a complaint.  Does anybody believe that Dr. Bashar Al-Ja’fari couldn’t do the same thing by hiring international lawyers to bring these murderers to justice?  Come on Dr. Ja’fari!  Let’s get going!  Bring these killers to justice.  Readers who have comments or additions to war crimes and crimes against humanity should write them in.  ZAF      

____________________________________________________________________________________

SOME INTERESTING PROPAGANDA:

Look carefully at this tape.  Those of you who know Arabic well might want to remark about the narrator’s use of the language.  I know this base at ‘Alma.  This is not the same one.  Moreover, it appears to be a 1970’s base all complete with obsolete SAM-3 missiles.  Of course, as you all know, Syria has S-300’s now, and they are all mobile. Bizarre:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NqgLWyiUCbc

A similar tape.  This one shows no signs of combat.  The SAM-3 appears to me to be a decoy.  I could be wrong.  But it’s so old.  There is no question that the equipment in this base appears to be obsolete.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQUcas0kIUQ

My conclusion is that the tapes are pure propaganda. 


Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /srv/users/syrianperspective/apps/syrianperspective/public/wp-includes/comment.php on line 2791
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
Anonymous
Guest
Level 0 - Anonymous
Anonymous
Keep writing Brother! Although I disagree, your approach is way too diplomatic. I prefer the approach Hassoun laid out in October 2011. From wikipedia: He said: “The moment the first missile hits Syria, all the sons and daughters of Lebanon and Syria will set out to become martyrdom-seekers in Europe and on Palestinian soil. I say to all of Europe and to the US: We will prepare martyrdom-seekers who are already among you, if you bomb Syria or Lebanon.” He added: “Do not think that the people who will commit martyrdom in France, Britain, or the US, will be Arabs… Read more »
Ziad Fadel
Guest
Level 0 - Anonymous

I’m with you all the way. Go for it. I’ll be there. ZAF

Anonymous
Guest
Level 0 - Anonymous
Anonymous

Most Europeans do not support the FSA salafists. The governments do because they are vassals to the USA and their Jewish friends.

Anonymous
Guest
Level 0 - Anonymous
Anonymous

Ziad,

Many would argue that we are in the post-legal society. The elite do what they want, and that’s that. Trying to go into court against the criminals who control the court is debatable.

This is going to come down to force, and maneuvering.

Paul

Anonymous
Guest
Level 0 - Anonymous
Anonymous

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=f11_1365081937
what would be your comment on this?
And:please remember – I’m still waiting for an answer,Leith doesn’t communicate anymore.

Anonymous
Guest
Level 0 - Anonymous
Anonymous
Well the only thing that can be said for certain from that video is that they aren’t SAA or any other official Syrian military forces. If actually real and not just total propaganda it’s possible they could be militia men from Hezbollah, they could be Kurdish militia, they could be Christian militia provided arms by the Syrian government or some other “home-grown” militia defending their homes and villages. Or it could be FSA supporters pretending to be captured fighters and FSA weapons and equipment being portrayed as having been captured. It is odd that any non-military militia force would have… Read more »
Ziad Fadel
Guest
Level 0 - Anonymous

Your insight is excellent and you raise very interesting points. ZAF

Sown on the Path
Guest
Level 0 - Anonymous
dear ziad, I have also seen SA-2 missiles with holes in them, near warheads. the missiles dont look… very exploded, and also very rusty. I have seen two videos where seemingly intact equipment was captured: one was a whole SA-2 base but without soldier corpses or anything of that sort, which made me wonder. the other was about al qaeda rats driving SA-8 point defence systems out of some military base garage or something. its not good to see them capture higher grade equipment like this from the syrian army. regards, bogdan. PS: I know around half of syrias SA-3s… Read more »
lipstick
Guest
Level 0 - Anonymous
lipstick

vouch safe

Ziad Fadel
Guest
Level 0 - Anonymous

Some of those missiles looked like they were decoys. Just a skeleton with nothing inside. ZAF

Souri Homsi
Guest
Level 0 - Anonymous
Anonymous
Guest
Level 0 - Anonymous
Anonymous
I believe that legal approach though underwhelming and yes diplomatic is part of the tactics that could be used. Al Capone was brought down through legal means. Wesley Snipes was incarcerated also using legal mumbo jumbo. It might not work but the process in and of itself will cause the other party to blink. Anyone who has ever been involved in legal procedure knows what a painful path it can be, how tortuous it can be to argue and defend legal positions. However the legal complaint may triumph and bring a out a favorable opinion that will make the aggressors… Read more »
Anonymous
Guest
Level 0 - Anonymous
Anonymous
“Gaddafi believed in using the courts.” And noble as it was how did that turn out for himself and Green Libya? The Zionists and their allies have openly stated they have no regard for international laws, heck they don’t even respect their own Israeli Supreme Court rulings. Forget about the Jihadi’s caring about laws. “Concerning martyrdom operations. I surprised that two years have gone by and the Syrian and Lebanese assets have not been activated.” Remember that there is a clear threat of NATO direct military action against Syria. A large portion of the Syrian military forces as well as… Read more »
Anonymous
Guest
Level 0 - Anonymous
Anonymous

You have some allies out here, Ziad. Keep pounding away.

http://www.abeldanger.net/2013/04/second-post-april-5-2013-war-crimes.html

Souri Homsi
Guest
Level 0 - Anonymous
wpDiscuz